The (((Southern Poverty Law Center))) has infested the Dept of Homeland Security and many police forces. See: Who Controls the SPLC. They are a modern-day version of the CHEKA and have concocted an assortment of twilight language they use to brand people. The CHEKA was used as Red Terror brute force against reactionaries in the Bolshevik Soviet Union and made everyone toe the line. A reactionary could be anyone deemed as not on board with their system.
The (((SPLC))) has a growing list of declared “hate issues.” If you have made it this far, then you are an English speaker. So let’s define the word “hate” and carefully consider whether such a concept should be some type of crime. Hate is, by definition, intense dislike. Synonyms would include loathing, detestation, dislike, distaste, abhorrence, abomination, resentment, aversion, hostility, ill will, and bad feeling.
So if a person committed a crime against another person, more often than not it might involve one or more of those synonyms. On its face, a crime is a crime, and any ill feeling adjective used is preposterous. Of course the poison of cultural Marxism championed by the (((SPLC))) is designed to link dislike of other races or even individuals with a crime, even if no actual crime was committed.
But this is where it gets tricky, as crime is defined as “a transgression of law.” One would assume that very few would call loathing, bad feelings or intense dislike a crime. You would be wrong. The poison has entered the system so much so that Americans are about split on criminalizing hate speech. Notice that I emphasized speech, not violence.
Speech is defined as “the expression of or the ability to express thoughts and feelings by articulate sounds.” So if one were to simply utter something that hurt the feelings of someone of another ethnic culture or race, those mere words constitute a harm in the world of (((cultural Marxist. Social Justice Warrior))) twilight language. The dictionary, at least up to now, has defined harm as “physical injury, especially that which is deliberately inflicted.”
Last week, we got an prime example of just how far this scam has gone. A transgender, one Ebony Belcher, age 32, was using the women’s bathroom at a supermarket when a female security guard swung open the door and ordered her to get out.
“She opened the door and came in and started calling me derogatory names,” Ms. Belcher claimed. Ms. Belcher said the guard told her, “You guys cannot keep coming in here and using our women’s restroom. They did not pass the law yet.” She said the guard grabbed her by the arm and removed her out of the store.
Belcher then proceeded to file a complaint with D.C. police. Instead of shrugging off the incident as a matter of private property, police arrested the guard pursuant of “hate crime” charges.
Here we have a whole slippery slope of what is being defined as a crime, and what is a transgression of a crime. May God help us.