News Ticker

Sandy Hook Shooting Narrative To Be Front-and-Center at Dem Convention

By MBH Administrator | 22 July 2016

MEMORY HOLE — The Sandy Hook active shooter event of December 14, 2012, will be on [show] at next week’s Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. Slated to speak is one Erica Lafferty Smegielski, “[t]he daughter of the elementary school principal who was slain in the Sandy Hook massacre,” the Connecticut Post reports.

Smegielski, the daughter of Dawn Hochsprung, will speak on Wednesday in Philadelphia as Democrats gather to nominate Hillary Clinton for president.

Readers may recall that Hochsprung gave a mysterious postmortem interview to the Newtown Bee …, presumably to associate editor Shannon Hicks, minutes after she was shot to death by Adam Lanza. As documented in the Sandy Hook Massacre Timeline:

In a December 14 Newtown Bee article unidentified school personnel are commended for their courage. Among them are school principal Dawn Hochsprung, who recounted to Bee Editor John Voket [5] how “a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went ‘on and on.’”

The problem with the account was that it conflicted with a subsequent storyline where Hochsprung was the first to be killed by the gunmen.

The original Bee article has been scrubbed from the paper’s site but is still available here and below. As Insanemedia observes, the report was retracted by the Bee shortly thereafter and the community paper issued this online statement on or around Dec. 17.

An early online report from the scene at the December 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School quoted a woman who identified herself to our reporter as the principal of the school. The woman was not the school’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who was killed in the Friday morning attack. The quote was removed from subsequent online versions of the story, but the original story did remain in our online archive for three days before being deleted. We apologize for whatever confusion this may have caused our readers and for any pain or anguish it may have caused the Hochsprung family.

Despite this and countless other anomalies concerning Sandy Hook, including complete demolitions of both crime scenes, Clinton shamelessly harnessed Smegielski’s special slant on the Sandy Hook narrative story earlier this year as part of her campaign against Democratic Party rival Bernie Sanders.

Smegielski attacked Sanders for the Senator’s position that gun manufacturers should not be sued for the December 14 incident. This was seized upon by the Clinton campaign.

Smegielski is a particularly shrill gun control advocate who since late 2012 has taken to social media to make her case against conservative political leaders and attack pro-Second Amendment pressure groups like the National Rifle Association (who routinely play along in the charade) all under the guise of her pain and suffering.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Smegielski is paid for her advocacy as Senior Outreach Director for the Michael Bloomberg-bankrolled Everytown For Gun Safety.

The Sandy Hook shooting still requires a thorough criminal investigation by responsible authorities. Those in the State of Connecticut or federal government who recognize the idiosyncrasies understandably fear action for violating confidentiality agreements, professional ruin, or worse if they blow the whistle on this and similar operations.

The Newtown event has generated tens of millions of dollars for those involved, essentially “buying” their silence for participation in the Obama administration and Democratic Party’s broader program of false flag terror and heightened police state measures that include disarmament.

Like the questionable 1995 school shooting in Dunblane, Scotland, (amazingly invoked by Obama in the wake of recent “active shooter” incidents) that led to the banning of semi-automatic firearms throughout the United Kingdom, the Newtown project failed to sustain such immediate efforts in the U.S. It nevertheless remains an anchoring narrative for the Democratic “law through terror and disorder” Party that seeks to further its platform through continued subterfuge and fraud.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • JackCade

    I’ve always wondered what they did to that kid to make him go off like that. I’m not blaming the victims, but it’s never been covered, and you just know the teased they shit out of him, and he seemed to have an agenda as to who he was shooting. Given that he killed his mother, you have to assume he was mad at being born, but they way that town acted after just makes me think something was inconvenient and was swept under the rug.

Secured By miniOrange