News Ticker

Did Bibi Committ One of Greatest Brain Farts of All Time?


With Bibi in trouble with kingpin Sheldon Adelson over his scheming and plotting (shocked, I tell ya), a look at another one of his plots is in order. On Sept.13, 2001 — just two days after the events of 9/11 — Benjamin Netanyahu went on NBC News and stated [at 1:40 in the following video], “It wasn’t a nuclear bomb, it was a 350-ton conventional bomb.”

For those who claim he is referring 1993 WTC, that was a 1,336-pound (606-kg) urea nitratehydrogen gas-enhanced device. So only off by over 349 tonnes.

For those who claim he is simply sloppy and is calling metal aircraft conventional bombs, a 767 at takeoff is 450,000 lbs., or 225 tonnes. This would have been reduced to well under 200 tonnes after flying to New York, so he would be off by over 150 tonnes.

Perhaps one could conclude that Bibi is a mental gymnast with three-dimensional chess-playing skills and has combined with precision the remaining weight loads of two metal aircraft in flight and taken the additional liberty of calling it a “conventional bomb” — not two bombs, but one. Regardless, that would be way over the heads of 99% of the viewers of this brain fart.

This is almost as bad as (((Larry “Pull It” Silverstein’s))) blowing it on WTC 7.

A new nationwide survey of 1,024 people conducted by online polling firm YouGov asked respondents to view the following video of WTC Building 7’s fall on 9/11 from four different angles. The results: 55% of those surveyed suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition, compared to only 21% who suspect it was caused by ordinary fires.

Forty-nine percent are more inclined to believe that only explosives can account for Building 7’s collapse. Just half that number (24%) are more inclined to believe the government’s conclusion that fires are to blame. Sadly, 27% don’t have enough confidence in their own perception to make a judgement. Still, this is good progress for the sane and truthful.

Big psychopathic reveal and slip up? Or just weird slippery snakes saying strange things? What do you really know, Bibi? He won’t tell us, so you decide.

Meanwhile, just one hour after the 9/11 event, Bibi’s side kick Ehud Barak is on BBC with all the mental-gymnast answers, including a recommendation to immediately deploy in a massive campaign against “sources of terror,” including Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Iran.

World Trade Center Explosion in Slow Motion: What do you see?

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Bill Kilgore

    The Real Terrorists of 911

    • Brabantian

      A couple years back I had a chance to talk to someone who attended Harvard College alongside rabbi’s son Michael Chertoff & lived in the same dormitory with him

      Apparently Chertoff was fascist-minded even as a young college student … Chertoff spoke longingly of how “Hitler would have won World War II if he had kept the Jews on his side”

  • Roy Hobs

    Here we are again……………… this surreal world that could be considered one long episode of “The Twilight Zone”.
    Can’t tell you how many people I have shown “this is an orange” on youtube, and then the total blank stare to follow. AND I’M THE CRAZY PERSON. My friends and family (past tense) all want me in a mental institute pumped full of SSRI’s. And then and only then can I sit at the Thanksgiving table.
    How can something so obvious be so incredibly hard to grasp. This is the ultimate question. What is really going on here??? This is a Spiritual War and people better hurry up and figure out who is the Creator.

  • bob saffron

  • bob saffron

    Conventional explosives or thermite don’t explain the strangeness of the debris.

    • Brabantian

      Yes the molten fused debris is a key factoid here … that has given a lot of traction to the VeteransToday claim that the World Trade Centre towers were brought down by ‘W-54 mini-nukes’ only around 30 kilogrammes in weight, that were allegedly produced in some thousands in the 1950s-60s, with some of them later ‘given to Israel’ … that story has seemed more true than the ‘nano-thermite’ or ‘directed energy ray’ theories, & fits the likely suspects

      But I am one of the people who has come around to the view of senior Swedish engineer Anders Björkman, that nuclear weapons have never existed, given the evidence that Hiroshima & Nagasaki were fire-bombing raids, mushroom clouds are chemical, & USA Soviet Union China Israel etc all gained profit & power from colluding in the nuke hoax

      Perhaps the heat from a massive 350-tonne bomb of some advanced kind was enough to create what we see

      • bob saffron

        Interesting your opinion of the nuclear bombs. “Rerevisionist” has been big on that idea for the longest time. I haven’t done enough study to embrace the idea yet. But the conventional explosive doesn’t explain the micronized dust or other anomalies like burning engine-blocks surrounded by untinged paper. Or those displayed here (without necessarily buying Wood’s DEW theory).