With abuses against whites increasing in South Africa, the concept of “right of return” has been put forth. The alternative term is “right of abode.” Ghana has one for folks of African origin, and of course Israel is the most well known. As it currently stands, many white South Africans who try to apply for citizenship to European countries, such as the Netherlands and U.K., are rejected outright. Many of these white South Africans seeking citizenship are direct descendants of the very same European nations that reject them. In the ultimate gesture of extreme political correctness (and hypocrisy), these same countries promote open borders for individuals (aka migrants) of non-European descent.
At the core of this issue is “waving the bloody flag of apartheid” and generalized anti-white demonization. The contorted logic is that if one supports the human rights of South African whites, then you support apartheid and are “racist”. Secondly it is perceived as embarrassing to the incompetent, corrupt majority government of South Africa. But try and explain the bloody flag of apartheid sophistry to the kids in this photo.
Concerned people can see how the issue is framed in the conversation on the video below on South African media. This is in response to a petition to the EU promoting the right of return (RoR). You can sign the petition here.
-The diminishers in this video seem to react and object to the term “ethnic cleansing.”
Takeaway: TNN covered the essentials in Part I. South Africa, in general, is an extremely dangerous country for all races. Whites as a minority are subject to majority rule, which includes reliance on black policing and open displays of racial hatred. Adding fuel to the fire, as covered in Part I, President Zuma recently proposed expropriation (return the land) of white-owned property.
In a literal sense, the threat of Julius Malema, the leader of South Africa’s Economic Freedom Fighters (communist and very anti-white), is not “ethnic cleansing” precisely, — at least not yet. The diminishers can quibble over terminology, but The New Nationalist (TNN) hardly sees that as worthy of air time.
“The land must be expropriated without compensation. We are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now.”
So for the purposes of dealing with politically correct shadow-language propagandists, I propose using the term “under ethnic threat.” Indeed, Genocide Watch rates the threat assessment as 6 on a scale of 8. The following graphic rates safety and personal security issues in South Africa. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or much empathy to see that being in a disliked minority race in this shit-storm environment would be gut wrenching and is not to be taken lightly.
-The gentleman in the interview suggested that South African whites are being legislated against and, in general, suffer from bad governance.
Takeaway: The talking-head propagandists are using a “come half clean” technique here. The other hack grudgingly agrees but chimes in by saying these RoR issues will set South Africa back- as if progress had been made. The gentleman effectively agrees and calls RoR an “extreme” position. Illustrating the typical “legislated against” point was the incredible step that the South African government took to ban international tennis, rugby, soccer and cricket events within the country because the clubs were too white. This was all “evaluated” under the Orwellian term “transformation barometer.”
-A talking head suggested promotion of RoR isn’t necessary as hundreds of thousands of whites have already left South Africa.
Takeaway: TNN’s concern is more for the large numbers of impoverished white South Africans more so than the well to do and connected. Those trapped people will need aid and assistance in relocating.
-There is an awful, dull and absurd inference by these talking heads (at 4:00) that the people signing the petition “aren’t even South African” and, therefore, should just ignore injustices. These nasty stooges go so far as blast the organizer of the petition because he is Brazilian.
Takeaway: Complete and utter nonsense. Sign the petition whether you are American, European, Latin American or of any race. Black leaders in South Africa have openly spoken of “encouraging” the whites to leave. Very well then, sign the petition. TNN will not bury its head in the sand and does not apologize for defending our ethnic interests. We cannot be swayed by such cheap-shot shaming and gaslighting tactics and, in fact, need to push back aggressively.
TNN conducted an extensive open source search on how this RoR and other white South Africa challenges are faring. Unfortunately, it appears the major SA NGOs are still involved with waving the bloody flag.
If there is an single important NGO or well-funded foundation concerned with white South African civil or human rights, please contact us or comment below. TNN would like to support you. Are there any NGOs supporting white South African immigration to Europe? Let us know. TNN would like to support you.
The Afrikaner organizations are organizing for self-defense, but seem hard pressed and on their heels. This folks have three-hundred year roots in SA and it looks like they wish to stay and, if necessary, fight. Again, TNN is concerned with the impoverished group, the forgotten people who have less voice and means to defend themselves. Not everybody wants to fight and die in a race war.
There are charities feeding 800,000 low-income and squatter whites in the country. This, too, was covered in Part I. TNN readers can donate here.
We will be amping up coverage on the threat to white South Africans in our Around the Web section and have created a new tag called “The Threat to South African Whites.” Stay tuned.