News Ticker

Trump: Only Explosives Could Have Brought Down World Trade Towers

PHOTO: The Age

In a radio interview on Sept. 11, 2001 — before the Sharknado narrative got started — Donald Trump essentially gave the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth version of the World Trade Center towers free fall. The Architects and Engineers presentation can be viewed in the second video below. Trump, who was knowledgable about the buildings, called the towers “very strong structures” and stated only powerful explosives could have taken them down. He dismissed cartoon physics and remarked that an aluminum plane could not have sliced through the steel girded exterior.

The Donald Trump interview aired on Sept. 11, 2001.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • bob saffron

    Nothing conventional can explain the hundreds of thousands of tons of micronized steel and other hard building materials that literally float up into the stratosphere. Explosives create a very broad range of fragment size, and far less nanoparticulates than we saw on 9/11. Thermite doesn’t explain that either.

  • Rufus Peckham

    I like the NTSB report. Fires in the building raged to 1500 degrees to melt or weaken steel.
    Pray tell, what was in the office that burned that hot and that long? Lets think of conservation of mass and what fuel is needed to keep a fire burning.
    When the planes hit the buildings, a giant fireball erupted. This means:
    A) the fuel burned up immediately (this isn’t true, the NTSB said so)

    B) the building was obviously full of explosives that somehow ignited when the plane hit because the NTSB says the cause of the steel to weaken and buckle was the remaining jet fuel burning, 45 minutes after the crash.

    We know B is true because the plane needed to not ignite some of its fuel on impact so it could save it for later to burn WTC1 and 2.

    Totally plausible, right?

    I know my office building is loaded with all kinds of highly flammable, slow burning, high temperature fuel just waiting around for a match.

    • To believe the official story it would be necessary to completely shut down all large buildings worldwide and rewrite the building code.

  • jeannonkralj

    “controlled demolition”

    These words should have clear specific meanings but instead they have been weaponized and used to deceive us.

    The Dr. Steven Jones / Richard Gage Architects and Engineers nanothermite gang version is the main continuing deception vehicle used for the deception and diversion of all 9-11 truth seeking efforts since day 1.

    I remember listening to Steven Jones and Alex Jones in the very early days and they both consistently ridiculed the idea of “no planes”, and that is a term that has been weaponized and not been understood correctly by many as well.

    Dr. Steven Jones, now faded off the scene and Richard Gage, now fading off the scene but A&E 911 Truth group resurrects itself around every 9-11. They all are one group and have been the main 9-11 deceivers from the very beginning and have been totally owned and operated by the perpetrators of the event.

    • bob saffron

      Cartoons like those of the 9/11 planes impacting the towers are easily reproducible by graphic artists. What is hard to appreciate is the absolute gall of the Israel-firsters behind the show.