News Ticker

Precursor To The Global Crime Syndicate: The 19th-Century Opium Trade

“History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.” — Winston Churchill

The Chinese opium trade of the 19th Century was instrumental to the early incarnation of the global Crime Syndicate and put it into high gear. It was just the right degree of exploitative criminality, deep-state intelligence and enormous looting to launch, enrich and link the progenitors of today’s system.

To review, during the first quarter of the 19th century the British were in desperate straits to procure tradable goods to the Chinese. China was only interested in gold and silver.

Sassoon & Sons

Enter unscrupulous David Sassoon (1792-1864), a Jew out of Bombay, who developed the drug trade in opium. This cash crop was perfect for Indian conditions in Bengal and Madras. Sassoon sent his all-Jewish agents into China and eventually his six sons, who proved to be ruthlessly capable crime operatives at carrying out the necessary infestations. They established what is called the “Rothschild’s of the East.”

Incidentally, it’s quite obvious Wikipedia has been thoroughly scrubbed by “someone,” because Sassoon’s role in establishing the Shanghai opium-bund (exchange) is only briefly mentioned. Almost the whole script is devoted to Sassoon’s Indian sweat-labor cotton-milling business. A more accurate version is available at Wikispooks. 

In actuality, Sassoon and his Jewish agents kick-started China’s opium market in China. As the Jewish Encyclopedia readily admits, they had a monopoly on the opium trade in both China and Japan. It further states that Sassoon attributed his great success to the employment of his sons as his agents.

Of course, the British were cut in on the deal and thoroughly corrupted. Transshipment into China was handled in the early days by British firms, such as Jardine Matheson & Co.

By 1839, this criminal operation in drugs had addicted an estimated five to 10 million Chinese and set back social and economic conditions in that country by centuries. It was one of the better divide-and-conquer strategies ever devised by the global Crime Syndicate.

Opium was prohibited in China, and the Manchu Emperor of China didn’t take the opium infestation laying down. Rather, he moved aggressively by dumping a fortune’s worth of the merchant’s opium into Canton bay and destroying production facilities.

Sassoon and his posse then successfully lobbied for military intervention. England sent an expeditionary force from India to intervene, and they ravaged China’s coastline in a series of battles. Eventually, they dictated the terms of a settlement.

The 1842 Treaty of Nanking opened the way for a further explosion in the opium trade, which went on until the Maoist Communists finally eradicated it a century later. At one point,  it was estimated that at least 30 million Chinese were addicted to opium.

In addition, Britain took the territory of Hong Kong, unilaterally fixed China’s tariffs at a low rate (aka “free trade”) and arranged for the “merchants” in Canton to pocket $3 million as compensation for the loss of their ill-gotten property.

The Sassoon family’s enterprise relocated to Hong Kong, where it expanded into “merchant” banking. Various opium dealers formed the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank. Over time, the bank — today known as HSBC — would extend its reach into the drug fields of the Middle East and Ibero-America.

Throughout the 19th century, British families Matheson, Keswick, Swire, Dent, Inchcape and Baring, and the Jewish families of the Sassoons and Rothschilds controlled China’s drug traffic.

In 1887, the big Sassoon and Rothschild clans merged by marriage. They were by that time operating out of London, where they intermarried with British aristocracy (City of London), were knighted and went on to finance and promote the Bolshevik and Zionist movements and God knows what else.

To the victors go the spoils, and over time the true history of the opium business was whitewashed and obfuscated by these powerful interests. They have branched off into media control, which today explains the criminal do-not-trust nature of that influence that I document constantly.

There is no way I could do justice to this topic in just this introductory article, but I believe at least some awareness must be applied to our fundamental intuition about how the world functions. Time and time again, you will see these Crime Syndicate scions landing top positions in intelligence and finance. Since the establishment of Zionist Israel, it has morphed into new manifestations.

Facing continual blow back, the British fought a second opium war in China from 1856 to 1860. In due course, the crop was grown in China proper, especially in Sichuan province, allowing a new generation of criminal enterprises to develop. This second war opened up the market to additional players.

In typical modern style, a Crime Syndicate “marketing campaign” emerged that promoted opium smoking as a fashionable, even refined pastime. Opiates were instrumental to the launch of a number of international pharma companies.

Enter the Americans: The destabilization of China and the building of the western U.S. railroads opened the floodgates for human trafficking (Shanghai’ing, as they called it) and expanding of the Chinese opium trade by Americans. The American families of Perkins, Astor and Forbes made tens of millions off of the opium trade. The Perkins founded Bank of Boston, which is today known as Credit Suisse.

William Hathaway Forbes was a director at Hong Kong Shanghai Bank shortly after it was founded in 1866. John Murray Forbes was the U.S. agent for the Barings banking family, which financed most of the early drug trade. The Forbes family heirs later launched Forbes magazine. And I covered Secretary of State’s John Forbes Kerry family lineage.

U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s grandfather Warren Delano created his wealth from the China opium crime racket. Like U.S. Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry, FDR claimed not to know anything about it.

Note that as a general rule of thumb, when the words “Boston Brahmin” and “merchant” appear in historic contexts, it’s whitewash code for drugs or other criminal activity.

The cesspool of “connected people” stemming from this opium cartel of British elite, American Brahmin and Sassoon-Rothschilds runs deep and wide well up to present day. I’ve barely scratched the surface here and can now see that I didn’t fully appreciate the influence of opium and bloodline connections.

I used to dismiss the talk about secret societies, such as Skull & Bones, but no more. Incidentally, the primary outfit in the opium trade was Russell & Company, the trustee of Skull & Bones.

Is it simply a coincidence that so many worldwide movers and shakers today spewed forth from this old line of criminal activity? Nothing to see here, move along?

Be Sociable, Share!
  • justforthecurious

    As to a who’s who behind all major events in modern known (and more interestingly unknown) history that you won’t read in conventional history books/websites – with a very few exceptions like your very informative website (as opposed to the huge amount of disinformation aka counter-intelligence websites in this alleged alt movement), – maybe http://www.isgp.nl might be an interesting reference for you and the readers of this website. Just discovered it only recently, but it seems to be thoroughly investigated and well documented in footnotes. Actually I found it indirectly through your website (funny since it’s written by a fellow-countryman). There’s a lot of information on there written supposedly by only one guy that I’m still digesting. Am interested in your thoughts about the material, in particular as the researcher in question seems to relativize the Zionist influence in power circles. Kind regards from a Dutch supporter and please keep up the good work!

    • Yes, I read that site’s incredible work on the Dutroux affair. I need to get caught up. His run down of credible conspiracy theories is reasonably close to mine, although I do believe there are numerous high level satanists.

    • Brabantian

      Regrettably, Joel van der Reijden of ISGP is a ‘limited hang-out’ euro-Israeli intel op … His Marc Dutroux files were posted as Joel’s ‘ticket to credibility’ enabling Joel to help Israel & CIA

      Joel even covers for later paedophile & child-killing crimes post-Dutroux … From Joel’s intel-tied ‘Institute for the Study of Globalisation & Covert Politics’ –

      Joel of ISGP claims ‘high level satanism’ is a ‘bogus’ theme … and that much of ‘ritual abuse’ of children never happens … & that there are not so many children ‘disappearing’ as claimed … Dutroux was the big case, other people are hoaxing, says Joel

      Joel of ISGP says it is absurd to talk of the NWO – New World Order, & that Rothschilds etc are not any great power in the world HA HA HA

      Joel van der Reijden claims “Osama bin Laden ran 9/11” … with help from USA, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan & Russia (!) … but not Israel HA … Joel’s fellow gov disinfo agent, alt-media ‘star’ Eric Zuesse recently started trying to peddle this kind of nonsense too, ‘It wuz da Saudi princes wot did it’

      Joel of ISGP further claims that an aeroplane “hit the US Pentagon on 9-11” … despite how even, e.g., US Army Major General Albert Stubblebine III, declared with certainty that a missile, not a plane, hit the Pentagon & the US gov’t is lying

      As everyone living around the Pentagon saw that day – the damaged Pentagon clearly visible from surrounding motorways – there was no plane wreckage visible (some was trucked in later), & the Pentagon’s grassy front lawn was magically undamaged … Very funny photo page on this blatant fraud:
      http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/killtown/penta_lawn.htm https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c842bdd063a3fcd85fb65d465812dfdca9b28ddb2c9c9c4922735061b70fa3de.jpg

      • justforthecurious

        Probably you´re right, haven’t read all his stuff as i consider myself pretty informed on some of the other major topics he discusses. As for the Dutch cases – though on international scale probably ‘marginal’ – they’re really insightful and a reliable source for exposing the rotten core of the ‘Establishment’ – regardless of the fancy image Holland manages to sustain about itself abroad. Tellingly, your video is blocked in our country…
        As for the other topics you raise, ‘satanism’ – whatever that may mean, most probably everything that is diametrically opposed to what is considered virtuous from a ‘Christian’ perspective, though highly praised in some other ‘world-beliefs,’ that consider a ‘higher deity’ false – is very much prevalent in elite circles though obscured. Reading suggestion is Michael Hoffman, amongst others.
        Highly suspectful in any case is also the use of planes on the Twin Towers, if you only consider the ‘mechanics’ of planes flying at this high speed on such a low altitude, that’s simply an impossibility.
        As for the whole NWO conspiracy, this is a bit outdated, considering the fact we reached this condition already on many levels. I would be very wary of the whole ‘transhumanism’ project that’s going right now and being pushed on so many levels, not in the least by Intelligence fronts by types like Elon Musk.
        to be continued…thanks for the discussion in any case

  • Brabantian

    Re the relevance of history … In 2015 a remarkable film was released in Germany, about Adolf Hitler in his traditional appearance & uniform, suddenly waking up in modern Berlin … Hitler walks & motors around in public, & the live candid reactions of German citizens, residents & tourists are caught on camera … Germans say things they often fear to say … Here, 4 minutes from the film with Hitler in public, very funny & a bit profound … ‘Er ist wieder da’ in German – ‘Look Who’s Back!’ English title

    • Bill Kilgore

      When you view stock footage of Hitler on the ground with his people, he was approachable, with old school politeness. By all appearance he seemed to relish the contact, and showed patience and affection particularly with the youth. The film actually picked up on that.