An editorial over the weekend by Harvard professor (((Gregory Mankiw))) in (((The New York Times))) really stuck in my craw. In a nutshell, Mankiw lambastes opponents of globalism for ignoring (((“the economists.”)))
After a entire page of theoretical gibberish, Mankiw gets to his bottom line: The anti-globalist forces are isolationists. In a very slimy way, he then links a truism with a slur. First the truism: “Trade skeptics tend to think, for example, that the United States should stay out of world affairs and avoid getting involved in foreign conflicts.” TNN would tend to agree. Then the slur: “They are not eager for the United States to work with other nations to solve global problems like hunger and pollution.” So Mankiw is employing twilight language here connecting a truism of nonintervention with a shaming lie about not giving a damn about folks abroad. Sorry, Mankiw, this does not combine.
Then he attacks nationalism with another slur: “Trade skeptics tend to think that the United States is culturally superior to other nations. They say the world would be better if people elsewhere were more like Americans.” This is utter nonsense. Two of the three participants of TNN are Americans. We most definitely do not consider the U.S. culturally superior. We point that out constantly. In fact, we feel the Mankiws of the world are the problem. America is culturally ill and needs to be restored and reinvigorated with an entirely new approach.
He then lays out the ethnocentrism slur. This slur is easy to counter. Nations, races and culture take centuries if not a millennium to develop. There are many who simply want to preserve this and not see it overrun. I would suggest Mankiw watch the following video for clues about that.
It is astonishing how these (((operatives))) are quick to lay out and define a deceptive narrative that belongs to nationalists as if they are the ones who own it. You don’t own this narrative, Mr. Mankiw. He even has the audacity to claim the viewpoints are a function of education and intelligence levels. Yes, here at TNN we know all about the (((cultural Marxist))) takeover at Harvard and other campuses across the country (see I, Too Am Harvard Shows Social Justice Warriors in Action).
Now for what I really think of this. The (((Mankiws))) of the world have been leading us down this road for decades, and look where it is getting us: to third-world status, and that is not an exaggeration. The conflicts and wars the U.S. and Europe were and are involved in have been dishonorable in every respect.
Intelligence versus ideology: This Jew Mankiw is basically saying, “Think like me or you are stupid.” It is simply astounding how anyone can make the claim that only their way is the intelligent way. What this so strongly illustrates is the power of the globalist Zionist in America. This (((minion))) can make these statements thinking that he will not be challenged. The media and political class all read from the same playbook, and they will never give voice to anyone who challenges them. They want America to just shut up and work for the masters.
Just the facts in terms of Ivy League Mankiw and the New York Times who gave him his sounding (((echoberg))) box:
Who controls the Ivy League: Of the 24 senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities, 20 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities by a factor of 41.5 times (4,150%).
Who Controls the News: Of the 65 senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines, 42 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 32.5 times (3,250%).
I am not going to get into a debate or distraction about whether the Protocols of Zion (allegedly written in 1901) were real or forgeries. I will say this though: Whoever complied it sure seemed to have great insight into methods and future developments. Here are a few examples of the protocol playbook:
Protocols 5:11 “… By all these means we shall so wear down the ‘Goyim’ that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the state forces of the world and to form a super-government. In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government Administration. Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.”
Protocols 9:3 “… We rule by force of will, because in our hands are the fragments of a once powerful party, now vanquished by us. And the weapons in our hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice.”
Protocols 15:3 “In the Goy societies, in which we have planted deeply rooted discord, the only possible way of restoring order is to employ merciless measures that prove the direct force of authority: no regard must be paid to the victims who fall, they suffer for the well-being of the future …”